Bangkok: "Natthapong" is calling for public support in amending the constitution, emphasizing its critical role in addressing illicit activities and corruption. He has urged the Election Commission to streamline the voting process to ensure clear and accessible participation for all voters.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, a Prime Minister candidate and leader of the People's Party, has been vocal about the need for constitutional amendments as a means to combat corruption and illicit activities. He highlighted the inadequacies of current independent organizations in punishing offenders, referencing the State Audit Office building's collapse as an example of these failures. Mr. Nattapong asserted that for organizations to function transparently, they must originate from verifiable sources accountable to the people.
He questioned whether independent organizations are still selected by senators from a particular political faction, suggesting that their origins are dominated by a single party. Mr. Nattapong pointed out that, unlike the 1997 Constitution, which allowed citizens to petition for the removal of independent organizations with 50,000 signatures, the current constitution does not provide this right. He argued that constitutional amendments are necessary to ensure state mechanisms function honestly and transparently, ultimately reducing corruption in the country.
Mr. Nattapong expressed no concern about the referendum's potential failure but emphasized the importance of not being complacent. He noted that February 8th marks a crucial day when citizens will cast their third ballot, the yellow one, in the referendum. He urged everyone to vote "yes," believing it aligns with the public's desire to eliminate corruption and move forward with drafting a new constitution.
When discussing the Election Commission's current debate over ballot distribution procedures, particularly the requirement of presenting oneself twice versus a single presentation for three ballots, Mr. Nattapong stressed the need for convenience. He cautioned against potential voter misunderstandings if required to enter and exit the polling booth twice, which could lead to confusion about the process's completion. He called on relevant agencies, particularly the Election Commission, to revise regulations surrounding advance referendum voting to maximize public convenience.