Bangkok: Prit emphasized that the model for the two-member Constituent Assembly (CAC), proposed by the Prachachon Party, is straightforward and mirrors the selection process for constituency and party-list MPs. He asserts that this approach will mitigate potential loopholes and complaints, particularly if it becomes a joint parliamentary resolution, thereby encouraging public voting participation.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Parit Wacharasindhu, a party-list MP and spokesperson for the People’s Party, elaborated on the proposal to draft a new constitution using a mechanism involving two committees: the Constitution Drafting Assembly and the People’s Representatives Assembly. He confirmed that this model aligns with the previously suggested elected Constituent Assembly, highlighting that using two ballots is akin to selecting constituency and party-list MPs, ensuring a simple yet participatory selection process.
Mr. Pris clarified that the People’s Representative Council, akin to an advisory or supervisory council, will comprise elected representatives from every province to gather public input. While the council will not draft the constitution, it will facilitate public feedback on the draft’s progress. This structure was created in response to the Constitutional Court’s ruling that Parliament cannot directly enable people to choose the drafters, leading to the establishment of two committees.
Addressing concerns about the delegation’s influence on the drafting team, Mr. Pris stated that the process would remain transparent, emphasizing the importance of public involvement through representative groups and MPs. Forums for gathering local public opinion are also part of the plan to prevent legal complications.
Regarding discussions with other parties, Mr. Pris noted that while he hasn’t reviewed all party models, discussions with Mr. Chusak Sirinil of the Pheu Thai Party suggest that their models share similarities with the Prachachon Party’s approach. Both models propose supplementary mechanisms rather than directly establishing committees.
Mr. Panusaya of the People’s Party emphasized that their bill was crafted with maximum public participation, aligning with the Constitutional Court’s guidelines to prevent future complaints. He expressed confidence that a parliamentary resolution would preclude any party’s ability to file a complaint, provided there is consensus.
Mr. Pris highlighted important timelines, stating that the second and third parliamentary sessions must conclude by December following committee deliberations, ensuring no procedural issues arise.
Regarding the Senate’s powers, Mr. Panusaya explained that the original draft amendment to Section 256 does not remove the Senate’s authority to review constitutional sections but adjusts the voting criteria for approvals. He stressed that senators should focus on national interests rather than personal impacts.
Mr. Panusaya assured that measures are in place to prevent political influence over candidates, distinguishing this process from senator selection. Emphasizing democratic principles, he advocated for broad public participation to prevent any political group from monopolizing control, given the diversity of public opinions.