Bangkok: “Benz Racing” has highlighted the necessity for documentation or a disciplinary investigation for the separation of prisoners. The former inmate, Mr. Ariyathat Worarojcharoendet, known as “Benz Racing”, spoke out following the death of former Superintendent Joe in prison. He emphasized the procedural requirements for transferring prisoners to solitary confinement or separate units, stating that such actions must be backed by official records or investigations into offenses committed within the facility. He dismissed the idea of prisoners being able to request isolation at will, citing the need for documented evidence to justify such arrangements.

According to Thai News Agency, “Benz Racing” further clarified that any sudden decision to isolate a prisoner without a formal process is not feasible. He stressed that all actions must be documented and routed through the proper channels to the prison director or commander, outlining the specific infraction that warrants investigation. He reiterated that verbal requests for solitary confinement are insufficient, as proper record-keeping is essential.

When questioned about the protocol for separating prisoners accused of offenses, “Benz Racing” explained that a disciplinary investigation typically precedes any transfer. He outlined scenarios such as fighting, possession of prohibited items, or disobedience, which could lead to a disciplinary case and potential transfer. He noted the broad interpretation of disobedience, suggesting that even minor gestures, like not showing respect to a guard, could prompt an investigation.

In response to reports about Superintendent Joe’s altercation with prison officers on January 8, 2025, “Benz Racing” acknowledged the prison’s establishment of a fact-finding committee. Superintendent Joe was accused of taking a camera without permission, leading to a conflict with officers. The investigation resulted in his transfer from Zone 7 to Zone 5 on January 10, 2025. “Benz Racing” emphasized the importance of documenting such incidents to substantiate claims of disciplinary violations.

Addressing the potential stress from conflicts with guards or inmates, “Benz Racing” acknowledged the pressure such situations could create. He remarked that prisoners facing scrutiny might experience heightened challenges, affecting their daily lives.

On the topic of prison-issued towels, “Benz Racing” mentioned that while prisoners receive towels from the facility, the size and significance of these towels should be clarified by the Corrections Department to prevent unnecessary speculation. He suggested that transparency would mitigate criticism and called for the department to provide visual evidence of the towels in question.

Bangkok: “Benz Racing” has highlighted the necessity for documentation or a disciplinary investigation for the separation of prisoners. The former inmate, Mr. Ariyathat Worarojcharoendet, known as “Benz Racing”, spoke out following the death of former Superintendent Joe in prison. He emphasized the procedural requirements for transferring prisoners to solitary confinement or separate units, stating that such actions must be backed by official records or investigations into offenses committed within the facility. He dismissed the idea of prisoners being able to request isolation at will, citing the need for documented evidence to justify such arrangements.

According to Thai News Agency, “Benz Racing” further clarified that any sudden decision to isolate a prisoner without a formal process is not feasible. He stressed that all actions must be documented and routed through the proper channels to the prison director or commander, outlining the specific infraction that warrants investigation. He reiterated that verbal requests for solitary confinement are insufficient, as proper record-keeping is essential.

When questioned about the protocol for separating prisoners accused of offenses, “Benz Racing” explained that a disciplinary investigation typically precedes any transfer. He outlined scenarios such as fighting, possession of prohibited items, or disobedience, which could lead to a disciplinary case and potential transfer. He noted the broad interpretation of disobedience, suggesting that even minor gestures, like not showing respect to a guard, could prompt an investigation.

In response to reports about Superintendent Joe’s altercation with prison officers on January 8, 2025, “Benz Racing” acknowledged the prison’s establishment of a fact-finding committee. Superintendent Joe was accused of taking a camera without permission, leading to a conflict with officers. The investigation resulted in his transfer from Zone 7 to Zone 5 on January 10, 2025. “Benz Racing” emphasized the importance of documenting such incidents to substantiate claims of disciplinary violations.

Addressing the potential stress from conflicts with guards or inmates, “Benz Racing” acknowledged the pressure such situations could create. He remarked that prisoners facing scrutiny might experience heightened challenges, affecting their daily lives.

On the topic of prison-issued towels, “Benz Racing” mentioned that while prisoners receive towels from the facility, the size and significance of these towels should be clarified by the Corrections Department to prevent unnecessary speculation. He suggested that transparency would mitigate criticism and called for the department to provide visual evidence of the towels in question.