Bangkok: Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong Phiwphan has clarified that the investigation of Pol. Col. Pakphum Phismai, a former subordinate of Pol. Gen. Surachet Hakpal, is being conducted in his capacity as an accuser, not as an act of leniency.
According to Thai News Agency, Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong emphasized that the questioning of Pol. Col. Pakphum aligns with Supreme Court rulings and criminal law, following the presentation of strong evidence linking him to the gold bribery case. Pol. Col. Pakphum, a former close associate of Pol. Gen. Surachet, provided evidence during the investigation, leading to the filing of a complaint. He is considered an eyewitness in identifying the wrongdoing of Pol. Gen. Surachet and his associates. The evidence provided by Pol. Col. Pakphum was deemed credible, leading to his questioning as the accuser.
The case file has been forwarded to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), which will determine further action against Pol. Col. Pakphum. The investigative team found the evidence consistent, including witness testimonies and electronic data, supporting the decision to question him as an accuser in accordance with legal procedures. Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong stated that this exercise of discretion is consistent with practices of the police, prosecutors, and the NACC.
Regarding the charges against Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat Panngew and other investigators in the gold bribery case, Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong confirmed their focus on work remains unaffected. He mentioned that filing counter-charges is a common legal tactic for defense in court.
Reports suggest Pol. Col. Pakphum is among seven individuals who may be suspects but are not yet charged. The decision hinges on evidence and intent, and whether he becomes an accuser or suspect is at the discretion of investigators, with the court making the final decision. The process involves the NACC before reaching the prosecutor and eventually the court.
Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong clarified that Pol. Col. Pakphum is not a benefactor but exercised a legal right to provide crucial evidence. Supreme Court rulings and NACC regulations support considering individuals who repent as witnesses, akin to granting a second chance to those who have reformed.
In response to allegations of intimidation in the summoning of Mr. Surasit Paekorn, a suspect in the gold bribery case, Pol. Lt. Gen. Trairong confirmed the procedures were lawful, with video documentation of the process. There was no coercion, and Mr. Surasit's associates were present. Evidence will be presented at a press conference to clarify the facts.
Regarding a potential counter-suit against Mr. Surasit for filing a false report, Pol. Gen. Trairong focused on current facts, expressing readiness to clarify any issues transparently.