Bangkok: The Election Commission (EC) has denied allegations that the resolution of the collusion case involving the selection of senators is subject to the discretion of “Secretary Saeng.” The EC emphasized that the process is independent, fair, and free from interference, with each case assigned to the Deputy Secretary-General for handling and ultimately decided by the EC.
According to Thai News Agency, the Election Commission Office has addressed reports of 577 submitted cases of alleged collusion in senator selection. Over the past nine months, the EC has dismissed 284 cases, leaving 287 cases pending. Of these, 100 are with the subcommittee, and 106 await orders from Mr. Sa-nguan Boonmee, the EC Secretary-General. The EC clarified these reports as false, asserting that their procedures adhere to independent regulations regarding investigation, inquiry, and adjudication.
The EC highlighted their commitment to fairness, ensuring both petitioners and the accused have opportunities to present facts and evidence. All petitions are subject to mutual examination and are brought to EC meetings for consideration, regardless of the level of investigation.
The case consideration process is structured into four levels. Initially, the provincial Election Commission office investigates and forwards opinions to the provincial election director. The case is then sent to the central Election Commission for further analysis by inquiry officers. At the third level, the Subcommittee for Adjudication reviews the matter and provides opinions, which are then submitted for EC consideration.
At the final level, the EC reviews cases from the Subcommittee for Adjudication, making decisions or orders promptly. The EC Secretary-General has delegated authority to two deputy EC Secretary-Generals to handle case files related to election and political party wrongdoing, maintaining the established process.
The EC refuted claims that 106 cases still await orders from Mr. Sa-nguan Boonmee, stating that the deputy EC Secretary-General acts on behalf of the EC Secretary-General. Regardless of the deputy’s decision, all case files are reviewed by the EC, ensuring transparency and adherence to protocol.
