Necklace Pawn Company Files Fraud Complaint Against Due Arisara

Pathumwan: Lawyer Ong and Brand Name Money Company Limited have officially filed a fraud complaint against 'Due Arisara', asserting that they will retain the pawned items until Due returns to Thailand for negotiations.

According to Thai News Agency, at 11:00 a.m., Attorney Witoon Kaengngan, also known as Attorney Ong, representing Brand Name Money Company Limited, went to Pathumwan Police Station to file the complaint. The company, known for accepting branded items, claims Due Arisara Thongborisut fraudulently sold a Bulgari necklace on August 19, 2024. Evidence includes an electronic contract and a money transfer slip showing funds transferred to Due's account.

Ms. Natthawut Punthanawat, a representative for the company, explained that when Due pawned the necklace, she claimed the certification was elsewhere. The company, which specializes in brand name product deposits and hire purchases, initially did not require the full product set. They focus on interest gains rather than product resale, offering contract renewals and monthly interest payments until the principal is repaid. The necklace, pawned from August to March, incurred a 1.25% monthly interest, adhering to legal stipulations.

Attorney Ong stated that the case concerns fraud, a criminal matter requiring Due's return to discuss responsibility and potential compensation. When queried about potential receipt of stolen goods, he clarified that the company lacked knowledge of the necklace's true ownership, precluding such charges.

Several pieces of evidence were presented, including a certification letter, power of attorney, four contracts, a photo of the necklace, and transaction records. Ms. Natthachuda, another company representative, urged Due to negotiate directly, noting only her lawyer had reached out thus far.

Post-report filing, Lawyer Ong noted that initial discussions occurred, but further questioning is pending. The company has yet to address debt acceptance formally and maintains regular operations, assessing items based on condition. The fraud case, potentially resolvable out of court, awaits Due's return for further talks.

When questioned on future dealings with Due, the company expressed willingness to consider her items, acknowledging human error and potential for redemption.

Deputy Chief of Investigation, Pol. Lt. Thiraphat Rungrungrat, confirmed receipt of the complaint and ongoing evidence collection. Should guilt be established, summons for Due Arisara's legal proceedings will follow.